Thursday, 08 October 2009
-
5 things I need to remind myself
1. There is no one righteous, no not one.
2. I don't know others motivations.
3. Sometimes I need to just let things go.
4. I hate vitriol, and yet sometimes I fall into it myself.
5. I really oughta put the following on my mirror: "Warning: Check for planks in eye"
Tuesday, 06 October 2009
-
Five Things That Used to be Sins
Sin is sin. Truth is truth. Nothing can change what is or is not a sin, right?
I agree with that. But in practice its a little more difficult. See, what we don't want to think about is that what has been thought of as sin does change. I'm not talking about some little cult group on the fringes. I'm talking about large swathes of the church being absolutely sure that something is a sin for a long period of time -- but now those same things seem silly. Something to think about next time you are so sure that you've got a direct line to God and everyone else is wrong.
1. Christmas. That's right all you spiritual descendents of Puritanism, those who idealize Oliver Cromwell and his ilk (for the rest of you, there are more of those people around than you might believe). Throughout the 1640s, a group of clergy and politicians obstensibly known as "the Godly" began gaining power in the British government. This group felt it was their responsibility to bring British law in line with their own Religious beliefs. Part of that was abolishing all feasts any holy days except for the sabbath (which was Sunday to them). So in June of 1647 the parliment suceeded in canceling Christmas. For thirteen years the celebration of Christmas was a crime, not based on an atheist's communist regime but based on the idea that celebrating it was a sin. In fact, celebrating it during that time would have been doubly sinful: first, because it was seen as pagan, and second because it was against the law (and of course breaking the law of "The godly" was a sin). So next time your teenager gets all cynical about the holidays, just tell her to think of Christmas carols as an act of rebellion.
2. Acting! Anyone who has ever read the "Anne of Green Gables" series probably remembers the nervousness of the girls when they were afraid of being caught in the woods play-acting. Throughout much of Christian history, acting has been thought of as sinful because you stand up on a stage and basically lie about who you are. The most famous "victim" of this sin was the French playright and actor known as "Moliere" (real name wasJean-Baptiste Poquelin), who suffered a hemorrhage in the middle of a performance in 1673. Before dying, he was refused the opportunity for last confession because he was an actor and all actors had been excommunicated all the way back in the fifth century AD (at the Second Synod of Arles, for those keeping score). So for over a thousand years, being actor was enough to keep you out of heaven. Somebody better tell Kirk Cameron.
3. Interracial Marriage. This one didn't change all that long ago (maybe 20 years in some parts of the country), but that makes a very interesting point: its strange how fast a theological construct can go from being widely accepted to being absolutely laughable. Laws against interracial marriage (on a primarily "moral" basis) date back to at least the 15th century in Spain, and existed on the books in many nations, including many parts of the U.S., until the 1960s. GooddbyeSickan has an excellent blog entry on some of the arguments that were used to justify this using the Bible.
4. Being Left-Handed. You're thinking this one is a joke, right? Nope. You know where the word "sinister" comes from? The latin for "left." The Bible is actually full of demeaning things to say about the Left Hand. Ecclesiastes 10:2 ("A wise man's heart is at his right hand, but a fool's hear at his left") is probably my favorite. Up until about 50 years ago, people who were left-handed were considered weak or unnatural, and there was a big effort in schools to teach left-handed children to become right-handed. I guess if this were still the case today we'd probably have Ex-Left ministries and big debates over whether being left-handed was acceptable as long as you promised to live your entire life with your hands in your pockets.
5.. Masturbation. Yup. Onanism. The solo tango. Spanking the monkey. Holding the . . . ok, you get the point. Now, this is actually something that still gets argued about. Prominent voices like James Dobson (who is not exactly licentious) have come down on the side of it not being a sin. I'm not sure that Dobson realizes what a big shock that would have been to most Christians throughout all of history. Not only does it have a long history of being a sin, I think you might be surprised by what verses were used to prove is immorality.
Lets open our Bibles to I Corinthians 6:9. There's a word in the original Greek (malakos) that literally means "soft." It has been translated a ton of different ways, suggesting such meanings as effeminate, lack of self-control, or (more recently) homosexuals. Lets be clear though: historically, that is not what the word has usually been thought to mean. The next phrase does include a term that could arguably be translated homosexual (arsenokoites), but malakos has historically been thought of as referring to self-abuse (as in masturbation). For the first 1900 years of Church history, theologians and clergy, especially the ones most familiar with Greek, had a pretty unanimous consensus that masterbation was what malakos referred to. As late as the 1888, John Kellog (yes, the inventor of Corn Flakes) was selling books based around the argument that masurbation was a sin best prevented by circumcision in boys and by pouring acid the clitorises of women. Kellog was a physician and a very popular lecturer in his day, giving advice on everything from nutrition to sexual purity. He was, in a way, the James Dobson of his day.
It really wasn't until the sexual revolution of the twentieth century that theologians started changing their tune, possibly based around the fact that they finally realized masturbation is a practically universal trait. Translations soon followed suit, and almost all modern translations skip over malakos or blend it with arsenokoites to nudge the verse toward an anti-homosexual stand and away from the traditional anto-masturbatory perspective.
So what do you think? Does this make you less sure of your own beliefs? And if we can decide some things aren't sins after all, does that mean maybe there a sins we haven't realized yet? Can a person be forgiven of a sin if they don't know its a sin?
Five sites I referenced in writing this post:
http://www.olivercromwell.org/faqs4.htm
http://www.imagi-nation.com/moonstruck/clsc35.html
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/electronic-publications/stay-free/10/graham.htm
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/19924
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977234688
Sunday, 04 October 2009
-
Five things about Lev 18:22
1. This isn't quite what you were expecting when you came to revelife.com today, is it? Well, I'm not trying to prove a point.
Honestly, I'm not.
Ok, I am. Sort of.
That is, I am trying to get people to think about things in different ways. I believe that if what you believe is right, you have no reason to fear a critical analysis of it. And if what you believe is wrong, you have even less ot fear since the sooner you correct yourself, the better. So either way, conversation and talking about differing viewpoints is a positive thing.
2. Ok, so lets get down to business. I mean it when I say I'm gonna try to keep these things short. But before we get into interpretations, we need to know the verse we are talking about. Lets open our bibles and read it together:
"We-et-zakar lo' tishkav mishkevey 'ishshah thoube eua"
Huh, that's not what your Bible says? Oh, I'm sorry. What I've got above is a very rough phonetic transliteration of the original Hebrew. Its important to remember we are dealing with a different language. Its easy to just accept the translation in our hands as authorative, but lets remember that the Bible wasn't written in English and no English translation is perfect.
Literally, the verse translates as "And with a male not you male shall lie down beds of a woman abomination she"
Makes perfect sense now! Case closed.
3. Ok, maybe not. Its getting a bit complicated, huh? What further complicates the issue is that its not all the same grammatical structure as all the other sexual prohibitions in the chapter. Over and over in Lev. 18 we get a phrase that very roughly translates as "don't get naked with X." All of a sudden we get this talk about beds and lying down. What's the difference? Maybe there isn't one, but then again seems significant that after all that repitition, suddenly we've got some different wording.
Anyway, all this opens a flood of possible interpretations. Yeah, I know there is one big one. I even gave it its own point:
4. "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." (KJV) Most translations follow this interpretation and I guess thats a point to be made, but one wonders if it is translated this way because thats what scholars think, or if thats what scholars think because previous translations taught them to think that way. A problem with this translation is that it leaves out the whole thing about beds (yes, it is plural in the Hebrew) and the fact that these vanishing beds belong to a woman ("as with womankind" is really not anywhere in the hebrew).
5. Here's the thing: this verse can and obviously has been translated to clearly prohibit all homosexual behavior. But if you look at the Hebrew, at the fact that its worded different from other sexual prohibitions, and the fact that this kind of stuff is so loaded with emotions for people on both sides, maybe that should give us pause and make us think about all this. The whole thing with the woman's beds makes me personally think its talking about either a man-woman-man threesome or talking about a homosexual affair taking place in the bed of a married couple. I'm not going to bet money on either of those readings, but there's nothing in the hebrew that disproves them.What do you think? Are my five things thoughtful, or am I full of it?
Five sites that I used:
http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/OTpdf/lev18.pdf
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pharseas.world/Leviticus.html
http://www.biblegateway.com/
http://www.gaychristian.net/justins_view.php
http://rictornorton.co.uk/homopho1.htm
Friday, 02 October 2009
-
Five Quick Things
1. Hi! I'm starting a blog because I'd like to share what I've learned about God, the bible, Church, Life, etc.
2. Each entry will have five points around a theme. Hopefully this will keep me from going on to long about any one thing.
3. I love to get feedback so please let me know what you think.
4. A little about me: I've been a Christian since I was a teenager and I love to write.
5. I'll be back soon with my first full entry.


